Eligibility registry
Allowlist of third-party RWA SPL assets with public risk cards: asset type, NAV/oracle source, transfer restrictions, known DeFi venues.
Activa is middleware for Solana RWAs — not another issuer. Eligibility registry, risk-banded vaults, collateral routing, and transparency by default.
01 · Problem
Tokenized Treasuries, equities, and credit receipts grew on Solana. Most of that capital still sits as static ownership while lending, routers, and margin rails are ready.
02 · Solution
A curated productivity layer between existing RWA issuers and Solana DeFi venues — with public mandates, not promised returns.
Allowlist of third-party RWA SPL assets with public risk cards: asset type, NAV/oracle source, transfer restrictions, known DeFi venues.
Curator-run strategies into defined bands with published allocation rules and curator bonds — mandates you can read, not APYs you can’t verify.
One-click paths that post eligible RWA into integrated lending markets and withdraw with utilization-aware UX.
Live utilization, oracle/NAV freshness, curator changes, and fee schedule — built as the product moat, not a marketing layer.
03 · How it works
Designed flow for review. Programs and venues are planned — nothing here implies mainnet availability today.
Third-party RWA mint enters the eligibility registry with a public risk card and transfer constraints.
Asset maps to a risk band (e.g. T-bill collateral, equity-collateral borrow, credit-receipt markets).
Vault or routing path posts capital into integrated Solana credit venues under published mandates.
Utilization, NAV freshness, curator bond, and fees stay visible — caps before scale.
04 · Token · $ACTV
$ACTV coordinates a protocol that must earn fees. At T0 it is governance + a future fee-share claim — not a yield instrument.
| Utility | What it does | What it does not claim |
|---|---|---|
| Governance | Parameter votes: eligible asset list, vault curator set, fee caps, pause powers, insurance-module rules. | Not “guaranteed yield voting.” |
| Fee claim | Share of protocol fees (vault management / performance, routing) when the fee switch is live — policy via governance. | No fabricated fee revenue at launch. |
| Curator bond | Curators post bond (token + stable), slashable for published policy breaches. | Not a free staking farm. |
| Gauges (later) | Optional emissions directed only to vaults that pass risk review — disclosed as bootstrap incentives. | Emissions ≠ organic RWA yield. |
05 · Roadmap · plan, not traction
Labeled as a plan. No implied delivery dates as commitments. Decision gates before scale.
Days 0–30
Days 31–60
Days 61–90
06 · Risks
Mitigations reduce risk; they do not eliminate it. Read before interacting with any future product.
Yield-bearing / RWA-adjacent products sit near securities and fund rules. Counsel before any vault that looks like a pooled investment vehicle.
Tokenized assets can gap, halt, or reprice off NAV. Liquidations and vault NAV can desync from spot.
Some RWAs are entitlement / KYC-gated. Composability is not universal; the registry must encode restrictions.
Lending markets can be exploited or paused. A productivity layer inherits venue risk from integrated markets.
Bad allocation or undisclosed leverage loops. Bond + public mandates mitigate — they do not eliminate — curator failure.
Governance tokens can trade as speculation regardless of roadmap. Do not treat $ACTV as the yield. Differentiation must stay on utilization / risk UX.
07 · FAQ
No marketing spin. If something isn’t live, we say so.
Next
Product second. Caps before scale. Links below are placeholders until docs and the public X account are published by the project.